The Discovery Of Alfred Wegener - 1075 Words

Did you ever wonder who discovered that the continents used to fit together as a super continent, known as Pangea? His name was Alfred Wegener. His discovery made him famous in the science world. Alfred Wegener was born on November 1, 1880. When he was young, he was believed to be very smart. Wegener received conventional education, which led him to attend grammar school in Berlin. There’s not that much known about his childhood, just that he was born and raised in Berlin, Germany. At 18, in 1899, he attended the University of Berlin. At the University he took many science classes before specializing in physics, meteorology, and astronomy. In 1902, he started to work for his P.H.D in Astronomy. Trying to work for his p.h.d, he spent†¦show more content†¦His father ran an orphanage, where he had many jobs. Alfred’s father was a classical language teacher and a pastor.His mother was a simple housewife. His older brother,Kurt wegner, was a meteorologist and a g erman polar researcher. Alfred worked with his brother kurt in the same place for some time. They both accomplished a lot. Even with the weather balloon that would of set a world record. Alfred Wegener was the youngest out of 5 kids. Their mom was Anna wegner and their was Richard Wegner and lived in Berlin ,Germany’s capital . In 1910, he was looking at a world when he noticed that the coastlines of South America and Western Africa looked like they use to fit together. After he did further research in 1911,he learned that fossils of the same type were found Brazil and Western Africa,and also after he was trying to connect the continents like a puzzle that South America and Africa had once been connected together to form 1 big continent.Alfred found evidence of a fossil that is throughout 4 continents. One of the fossil that was found four continents wide was called the fernShow MoreRelatedPlate Tectonics: Theoretical Aspects and the Geological History of North America860 Words   |  3 Pagesgeological history of North America, in order to illustrate how the discoveries regarding the movement of plate tectonics have led to new ways of thinking about the formation of continents and about the Earths surface, the development of mountains, oceans and valleys. In relation to this chapter, it is interesting to know how the discussion about plate tectonics emerged. Initially, scientists adhered to the fixed Earth model. Alfred Wegener was the first scientist who attempted to shake this belief andRead MoreThe Current Shape Of Earths Landmasses Was First Proposed By Abraham Ortelius1699 Words   |  7 Pagespossibility of continental drift several decades before Alfred Wegener in his publication The Creation and its Mysteries Unveiled. He came to this conclusion by identifying similar plant fossils that were found in America and Europe. He also believed that the cause of the fragmentation of the supercontinent was due to the Great Flood of the Bible. Eduard Suess was another who proposed the idea of a supercontinent much earlier than did Wegener. In 1885 he claimed that there was a supercontinent namedRead MoreEssay about Alfred Wegener and the Continental Drift698 Words   |  3 PagesAlfred Wegener was a meteorologist and astronomer. He was the first scientist to introduce the theory of the continental drift. Wegener theorized that at one time the continents were one large landmass or Pangaea that had drifted apart. His ideas were initially rejected by other scientists. It was not until long after Wegener’s death that proof was obtained and his theory verified. The Life of Alfred Wegener Alfred was born in Germany in 1880 and led a very busy life. He received a PhD in astronomyRead MoreLab Lesson 2 Essay942 Words   |  4 Pages22 4.0/ 4.0 Points Who proposed that all of the present continents were once joined together in a single supercontinent called Pangaea? A.Alfred Wegener B.Charles Darwin C.Arthur Holmes D. Harry Hess Answer Key: A Question 2 of 22 4.0/ 4.0 Points The scientific community rejected the theory of plate tectonics because Alfred Wegener could NOT A.identify a mechanism to move the continents. B.disprove competing theories that were not accepted by scientists. C.find geologicRead MoreScience Is All About Discovery, And Learning Why Things Happen Essay1583 Words   |  7 Pagesabout discovery, and learning why things happen. The world is full of mysteries and it takes a special person to desire to discover the answer to the world’s biggest mysteries. Scientists everywhere devote their time and energy to discovering information that will change how people view the Earth. One of the most important discoveries is how our continents were once together and how they divided. One of the earliest theories of how our continents were divided came from scientist Alfred Wegener in 1915Read Moreâ€Å"Volcanic and Seismic Events Are Major Pieces of Evidence Towards Proving That Plate Tectonics Theory Is Valid’ Discuss the Extent to Which You Agree with This Statement603 Words   |  3 Pagesâ€Å"Volcanic and seismic events are major pieces of evidence towards proving that plate tectonics theory is valid’ Discuss the extent to which you agree with this statement (40 marks) The plate tectonics theory was made by a German named Alfred Wegener. He stated that a single continent existed about 300 million years ago named Pangaea and that it split into two continents of Laurasia in the north and Gondwanaland in the south. Today’s continents were formed by further splitting of the two massesRead MoreEarth Science Essay884 Words   |  4 Pages1. Summarize advances over time in determining the age of the Earth, including the importance of the discovery or radioactivity. Herodotus counted layers of earth near the Nile River in 450 B.C.E. The Bible was used in the Middle Ages to compute the age of the Earth. The 18th and 19th centuries brought a more scientific look into determining the age of the Earth by studying the salinities of the oceans, the rates of sedimentation, and models of cooling of different materials in order to calculateRead MoreChapter 2968 Words   |  4 Pagessupercontinent named by Alfred Wegener, is thought to have begun to break apart about 200 million years ago. 4. Describe the four kinds of evidence that Wegener and his supporters gathered to substantiate the continental drift hypothesis? Wegener and his associates found that the fit of the continents, fossil evidence, paleoclimatic evidence, and similarities in rock type and structural features all seemed to bridge together the now-separated continental landmasses. 5. Explain why the discovery of the fossilRead MoreThe Types Of Tectonic Plate Interactions1523 Words   |  7 Pagesrift formation, streams and rivers flow into the low valleys and long, narrow lakes can be created. 2. Explain the Theory of Plate Tectonics in your own words. The Theory of Plate Tectonics (originally called the Continental Drift theory by Alfred Wegener) is the scientific theory that the Earth s outer shell (lithosphere) is divided into several plates that glide/move over the mantle, which is the rocky inner layer above the Earth’s core. This theory was formulated in the 1960s and 1970s as newRead MorePlate Tectonics Theories Analysis Essay852 Words   |  4 Pagesinto the seven continents we have today. The first comprehensive theory of continental drift was suggested by the German meteorologist Alfred Wegener in 1912. The hypothesis asserts that the continents consist of lighter rocks that rest on heavier crustal material, similar to the manner in which icebergs float on water. Wegener contended that the relative positions of the continents are not rigidly fixed but are slowly moving at a rate of about one yard

Agamemnon Vs. Achilles Essay Example For Students

Agamemnon Vs. Achilles Essay Agamemnon vs. AchillesDuring the ancient Greek period the people believed that the gods lived on Mt. Olympus and could do whatever they wanted to. The leader of the gods was Zeus; he was the most powerful god. The gods had the power to intervene with the mortal lives if they felt that it was necessary. The Iliad is an epic poem. In the story of the Iliad the two main characters were Achilles and Agamemnon. Achilles was seen as the great Greek hero, he was the strongest man alive at the time. His father was a god but his mother was only a mortal. He was bathed in the river Styx as a child and he became almost immortal. The only piece of his body that could be injured was his heel. In the beginning of the story we find out that the gods are angry with Agamemnon because he has been mean to a holy man. The gods in turn sent a huge plague down onto the people. The gods Apollo was responsible for starting the plague, he was convinced by the holy man to seek revenge upon the people. Agamemnon was the King of Mycenae; he was very similar to Achilles. Agamemnon was the leader of his army and was very proud of his army. Although he never took any big risks in battle, he always took credit for everything and wanted the largest share of plunder after it was all over. He shows no emotions, and does not trust his army, and is always testing them. Agamemnon is not well liked by his people, but he is respected. Agamemnon is always trying to get something for himself in any situation. This can be seen when the gods request that he returns Chryseis, a prize from a battle that he won. Agamemnon will not return the girl unless he receives Achilles prize of war, Briseis. Agamemnon says to his two servants â€Å" Go along, both of you to Achilles quarters and take his charming Briseis by the hand to bring to me. And if he balks at giving her I shall be there myself with men-at-arms in force to take her- all the more gall for him† This shows his lack of respect and care for other people. He thinks that he deserves anything that he desires, but he is wrong. Chalcas was a seer to the Greeks. He told Agamemnon that he did not approve of his doings, and that he â€Å"brought calamity,† and that Agamemnon was â€Å"from the depths of hell.† These word from Chalcas show that the seer did not think that Agamemnon was very good person, and that what he did was wrong. Everyone on the other hand loved Achilles. Even thought he possessed superhuman strengths, and held a close relationship with the gods he had many character flaws that did not allow him to strive in all aspects that he could have. His flaws did not allow him to act with the nobility and integrity that he could have. Unlike Agamemnon, Achilles shows his emotions, but he cannot control them. He strives to reach glory in every aspects of his life, and when he can’t he becomes angry and cannot control himself. When Agamemnon belittled him by taking his lady away from him, his rage built up inside and he refused to fight anymore. Although Achilles is consumed by the bloodlust, pride and wrath, he also shows that he has emotions in the final book when he allows the desecrated body of Hector to be returned to his family and friends. Even though Hector killed Achilles best friend, he does the noble thing and allows the body to be returned to its original home. Achilles cried with the old man about the loss of loved ones, and he allows the man to take the body. â€Å"As you wished, sir, the body of your son is now set free. He lies in state. At the first site of dawn you shall take charge of him yourself and se him. Now let us think of supper.† This quote shows that Achilles believes in tradition, it is Greek tradition to celebrate the closing of a deal by eating food with the people involved. The tradition of honoring a corpse and returning it to its homeland was also shown. The goddess Hera is on Achilles side, and assists him in his life. Agamemnon does not like Achilles because he knows that he is a better fighter but cannot admit it. He holds a personal grudge against him, but he can’t do anything to change it. .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 , .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 .postImageUrl , .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 , .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1:hover , .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1:visited , .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1:active { border:0!important; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1:active , .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1 .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u44d857ef7ebd154306a25860fcfcded1:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Biotechnology1 EssayI believe that Achilles anger is justifiable because he had something taken from him unjustly. Agamemnon stole Achilles lady because he had to return his. This is highly unfair, and everyone knew this except Agamemnon. When he withdrew from the battle though, it only hurt his own name and reputation. Achilles was supposed to be a great fighter, and a real warrior would never withdraw from a battle over a woman. Throughout his life, Achilles strived to make his reputation strong, and by dropping out of the battle he ruined all that he had done that was honorable. I think that Achilles could have proven his point in a better way, and still kept his honor. Overall I believe that what he did was justified. In conclusion I believe that Achilles was the better character in this epic. He tried to be a good person, even thought he had many character flaws that did not allow him to be as great as he wanted to be. Agamemnon on the other hand, was a horrible person and extremely arrogant. Agamemnon tries to manipulate people and situations to best fit his personal benefit. Achilles showed emotions and was able to express how he felt to people; this factor alone will make readers like him more. Agamemnon and Achilles both held leading roles in the story, but Achilles was the main character. Mythology